DELAWARE MODERN
PEDIATRICS, P.A.
David M. Epstein, M.D.
300 Biddle Avenue, Suite
206
Springside Plaza, Connor
Building
Newark, Delaware 19702
Phone: (302) 392-2077
Fax: (302) 392 - 0020
www.DelawareModernPediatrics.com
At a certain age, a typical child will say:
“Guess what, Mom, Dad? I’ve decided that you can’t tell me what to do anymore. I know what I want to do, and that’s what
I’m going to do. See you later, bye!”
Many parents will respond by saying:
“No, sorry. I’m the parent, and you are the kid, and I’m going to tell you what to do, and I expect your cooperation.”
This conversation typically begins in some form
when the child is a toddler, and in many families continues through the teenage
years. Teaching discipline and cooperation in this manner works fairly well,
for a while. But eventually, every
child starts to wonder why things have to be so authoritarian. “Why can’t I make my own decisions?” the
child may ask. “Why does someone always
have to tell me what to do? Why does
no one trust me to make my own decisions?”
In response, I have a different suggestion. When
the child says, “You can’t tell me what to do,” I suggest that the parent respond
(in some form):
“You’re absolutely right. I agree that you will decide your behavior on your own.
“I can tell you what I’d like you to do, but I can’t
make you do it; you must decide to cooperate, or not. I suppose I could drag you here and force you to obey, but you’re
getting a little big for that.
“However, I will tell you what your choices are. And I will also tell you what happens if you
do what I ask, and if you don’t do what I ask.
I’m only going to tell you once, and then you can decide which path to
choose. Then I’ll wait for your decision.”
For
example, instead of saying, “Pick up your toys. Please pick up your toys.
Okay, you didn’t pick up your toys, so I’m putting all the toys in the
attic for three days,” you might try saying something like this:
“There
are toys all over the floor. Now, I
don’t care who picks them up. If you
pick them up, I’m sure that you will put them someplace where you can find them
again. If I pick them up, I will put them in a box, and the box will go in the attic
for three days. Now it’s up to you to decide.
I’ll be back in ten minutes.”
For a
younger child, such as a toddler, instead of saying, “Get off the stairs. Get off the stairs. Oh, you’re still on the stairs, so I’m
coming to get you,” you might say something like:
“I see
you on the stairs, and you are not going to be there in fifteen seconds. Now, would you like to come off by yourself,
or would you like me to come get you?”
(Naturally,
my 15-month-old daughter would grin, say “Get! Get!” and turn to scramble up to
stairs. That was okay, because I would
chase up the stairs after her, pick her up, kiss her and say, “Oh, you’re such
a teaser,” and carry her down the stairs giggling. But when we reached the bottom, she didn’t get back on the stairs
because she understood that she had made her own decision.)
Now
there are four parts to this system that make it work.
1. Tell children the consequences before
they act. They need to know what
happens if they cooperate (and what happens if they don’t cooperate) before
they choose. This way, they can weigh
whether it’s worth their cooperation.
Of course, you need to know what you will do if they cooperate (and what
you will do if they don’t cooperate) before you set the rule. Obviously,
some planning is required.
2. Children choose their behavior. No
longer will you give your children direct instructions; you will act more like
a guidance counselor than a policeman. But the parent chooses the outcome. You
must pick consequences that you can live with, regardless of whether the
children cooperate or not. If you say,
“If you act out at the party then we’re leaving,” but you don’t want to leave,
then you’ve made it difficult for yourself.
Of course, this also means that you are not permitted to become angry if
they choose the “wrong” behavior; the idea is to set things up so that everyone
is satisfied no matter which choice the children make.
3. Only give one warning of the
consequences. This may be the hardest
instruction of all to follow. But it is
extremely important, no matter what type of discipline you are using. If your children routinely receive three
warnings, they will understand that the first two don’t count; thus, two-thirds
of the time they did not have to accept the consequences of their own behavior,
and the lesson is not taught.
4. Follow through; keep your
promises. The children need to know
that they can rely on your word to predict the consequences of their
behavior. If they learn that they can’t
take your word for what’s going to happen, because you don’t always follow
through, then they will have to test you in the future to discover the
consequences of their actions each time.
But
don’t add extra punishments. Thus, you are not permitted to say, “You didn’t
pick up the toys, so the toys are going in the attic as I promised, and
no TV for the next two hours because I’m angry.” The children were not able to predict that consequence, and they
have not learned that they could predict the consequences of their behavior.
Many
people believe that the only purpose of discipline is to teach children to do
what they are told. Frankly, I disagree.
First of all, it rarely works.
And second, even when it does work, they have then learned that they
need to be told what to do all the time.
Instead,
I believe that the purpose of discipline is to teach children to decide their
own behavior, based not on a power struggle, but based on their own assessment
of the risks and benefits. This is what
I mean by “taking responsibility for yourself:” learning to predict and accept
the consequences of your own behavior, and to choose your behavior based on
your predictions of those consequences.
All
children, as they grow up, need to learn to predict and accept the consequences
of their own behavior. (You may know
adults who have not learned this task; generally, these people are in deep
trouble.) Many parents begin teaching
“responsibility” in the early teenage years.
But I believe that this is far too late. The skill to make decisions for yourself is a life-long skill,
and the earlier in life one starts, the easier it is. In addition, the consequences one suffers as a child are less
dire; failing to get a cookie or losing a privilege is much less traumatic than
some of the consequences that result from “testing” behavior in adolescence.
Occasionally,
parents may say, “I tried your method, Dr. Epstein, and it didn’t work.” My
response is that it depends on what is meant by “work.” If by “work” one means
that the children learn always to obey their parents, then the parents are
correct: it doesn’t work. In fact, nothing “works” to teach a child
always to be obedient.
However,
if one means that the children have learned to predict and accept the
consequences of their behavior, then this philosophy always “works,” if the
parent sticks with it, and if there is no personality disorder.
Sometimes,
parents will comment, “I don’t think they understand the choices.” My response is that they probably understand
you perfectly well; most children have the language skills to understand these
concepts by fifteen months of age. (My
wife and I began this method with my daughter when she was nine months old, and
she clearly understood us!) However,
the children may not believe you that these consequences are
predictable. Therefore, you must demonstrate that they can trust your
word, and will receive these consequences, based on their behavior. You do this by being consistent, being clear
beforehand about what the consequences are, and following through every single
time. In this way, your children learn
to believe you when you explain the consequences of their behavior.
Appropriate
consequences do not always have to be punishments. “Bribes” are acceptable as well, and even encouraged.
Behavioral
experts recommend, in fact, that in general there should be about four times as
many positive comments as negative ones, in order for the child not to perceive
a generally negative attitude from the parent.
So you
will always want to emphasize the positive.
For example: “If you pick up
your toys now, you will be able to play with them later.” In some cases, both arms of the decision may
result in pleasant consequences. “You
may have bologna for lunch, or cheese; which would you like?” Of course, both
choices are tasty. But the child will
only be permitted to eat what he asked for; he should not be permitted to
change his mind after it is on the plate.
Any
consequences that you threaten should happen immediately, so that the child
does not later forget what he is being punished for. Punishments should be very mild; the idea is not to make the
child angry, but simply to remind the child that there was a price to pay for
his behavior.
And once
the punishment is finished, then it is finished. Move right back into play and
productive activity. Don’t continue to remind the child that you are angry
because he didn’t cooperate; this simply makes him feel guilty without teaching
him more than he has already learned.
Most
important, remember to give only one warning.
Multiple warnings undercut the child’s sense that the consequence was
predictable. If you feel guilty about
imposing the consequence, you probably should have chosen a milder one.
Some
members of your extended family may not understand or agree with your
discipline philosophy. That’s ok, as
long as they don’t interfere with your authority. It needs to be clear to everyone that the parents have the final
say over discipline. (If relatives have
criticisms, even constructive ones, they should be given out of the child’s
hearing.)
Many of
your relatives may have raised children with a more authoritarian philosophy.
They might think of your style as overly permissive. It might be helpful for the parents to have a ready explanation
for puzzled relatives and friends. You
might say, “We believe that our most important goal is to teach our child the
skills she needs to make decisions about her own behavior. The mistakes she
makes now won’t hurt her. It’s ok if she makes a mistake now, IF she learns
from it.” You might give them a copy of
this pamphlet to read. If they have
questions, give them my phone number; I am happy to discuss the issue with
them.
Your
ability to enforce your discipline techniques with your relatives may be
limited. They may feel much happier
imposing their own discipline techniques when you are not around. That’s fine; don’t feel that you are being undermined if the discipline
technique at a relative's house is different from yours. Children can easily learn that different
adults have different rules, and different styles. (Of course, if you are concerned for the child’s safety or
health, you always have the option not to allow the child to go unattended, and
to invite the relative to your house instead.)
Parents
make mistakes. They know it, and the
kids know it. That’s ok. In fact, if it were possible to be a
“perfect” parent, being perfectly consistent (and never angry) during the
child’s entire life, the child would not learn to be flexible when dealing with
other authority in the outside world which might be inconsistent and
unpredictable.
We all
fly off the handle sometimes. “You’re
grounded for the rest of the year!”
“I’m going to take all your toys away!”
“We’re not going to Disneyworld!”
It’s useful for your kids to see you express a little emotion sometimes,
to let them know that it’s ok for them to express anger and frustration, too.
What
should you do when you realize you’ve set a rule or consequence you
regret? Don’t just pretend you didn’t
say it. Your child will then be
confused. (They may think you forgot, and
fear the moment when you’ll remember again.)
Instead, when everybody calms down, say something like, “Look, honey, I
was angry and I said something I didn’t mean.
I’m sorry I confused you. What I meant to say was that I’m going to take
the toys you left on the floor, just like I always promise when you leave your
toys on the floor.” Your children, of
all people, will certainly empathize with your remorse for a mistake, and may
be eager to console you! This does not undermine your authority; in fact, it
reinforces it for the next time that you don’t make a mistake and remain
consistent. They see you really working to stay consistent and predictable.
Some
children learn that their parents can be embarrassed into breaking their own
rules in public. If you dread taking
your child to the grocery store or a restaurant, you may be inadvertently using
a less effective discipline technique there.
In
public, your rules should be the same as at home. If it’s not ok to throw food or shriek in a restaurant, it
shouldn’t be ok at the dinner table.
Even
more important, your consistency should be the same, too. Don’t be embarrassed if your child has a
temper tantrum in the grocery store.
You might decide to allow the tantrum to run its course, right there in
the vegetable aisle; if you simply stand with your arms folded, don’t talk to
the child, and wait patiently for the screaming to end, most adults will give
you a sympathetic glance and stay clear.
(Those who don’t can be given a polite but cool “Thank you for your
opinion.”) Or, you might decide that
the tantrum is better dealt with by taking the child to the parking lot until
it’s over, leaving the grocery cart in the aisle.
Of
course, you must set it up for the child beforehand. Explain, before you enter the store or restaurant, what behavior
you expect, and what consequences to expect if your expectations are not
met. This works even if you’re alone
with several children at once. “If
anybody has a tantrum at McDonald’s, everybody will get to stand in the rest
room with me until it’s over!” (Tell
the staff not to clear your food…)
There
are certain chores that you may simply expect will get done without
negotiation. Perhaps you expect assistance setting the table, for example. You can still present your expectations
without being authoritarian. Explain how your children’s help results in
consequences you and they enjoy. “The
more help I get, the faster dinner goes on the table.” As always, if they would choose to have a
later dinner, but you do not accept this, you may have to raise the ante (in a
positive way). “Well, you may watch TV
(or leave your chair etc.) only after the table is set.” If you decide for yourself what your
ultimate position is before you discuss the rule, you will not need to
negotiate your expectations.
There
will be occasions when this system is inappropriate, especially regarding
safety issues. Bargains such as “If you
run out in the street, you’ll get run over by a car, but that’s up to you, you
choose...” are clearly ridiculous.
However, if you acknowledge that, in general, the child is in charge of
his own behavior, then on those rare occasions where a true safety emergency
exists, your direct instruction will be recognized as unusual, and the child
will be more likely to pay attention.
Remember
that your purpose is to teach your children an important life skill: the
ability to predict and accept the consequences of their behavior. There will be times that your children will
look you straight in the eye and deliberately choose the option that you would
prefer they not choose. Everyone must
be okay with this, as long as the children recognize the price they are paying;
if they are willing to pay the price in order to make their point that they
have chosen their own behavior, then you must be willing to live with the
bargain too.
You will
notice that nowhere in this discussion have I suggested what rules to set, or
what punishments or “bribes” to use. These decisions are yours to make as
parents, and each family will make different decisions. But as long as your children understand that
the behavior is theirs to choose, and that the consequences are predictable,
then over time they will learn the lessons needed to guide their own behavior
without parental direction.
I must
warn you that very few of your friends and relatives will follow a system like
this. You may not have been raised this
way yourself. That is why this written
commentary is helpful, to refer to when you get frustrated. As you can see,
there is a learning period for the parents as well, to get used to this system
which allows a child to choose his own behavior most of the time. This does not come naturally to many people,
and requires parental self-discipline.
That’s okay. (You might wish to
start by setting only one rule and consequence at the beginning, such as
cleaning up toys.) As you become more
comfortable with allowing your child to choose his behavior, and then imposing
the consequences that you have warned him about, you will find that both of you
learn together.
In fact,
perhaps the greatest gift that parents can give their child is the gift of
trust. When the child hears the parents repeatedly assure him, “We trust you to
make these decisions,” then over time the child will feel trusted and
empowered. As he learns that he is
trusted by his parents, who are the most important people in his life, he will
learn to trust himself. When this
happens, you will know that you have given your child the most powerful boost
to self-confidence that anyone could ask for.
©
David Marc Epstein MD 1997, 1998, 2000, 2007